Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cook et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
David Cook and Vickie Cook
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Cooks v. Averitt Express Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
David Cooks
Defendant:
Averitt Express Inc. and Angela Lecomte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Metroplex Atheists v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 4:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Metroplex Atheists
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth, Downtown Fort Worth, Inc., Mattie Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Dean et al
as 4:2021cv01141
Plaintiff:
Lapaca Joe Jefferson
Defendant:
Aaron Dean, City of Fort Worth, Ed Kraus and others
Intervenor:
David Bakutis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Rowan Companies, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03811
Defendant:
Rowan Drilling (U.K.) Limited and Rowan Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cook v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00083
Plaintiff:
David Cook
Defendant:
Alonso Ammsord and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Sowell et al
as 4:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
Israel Curtis
Defendant:
Donald Sowell, Tommy Gage , Joseph Sclider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shipman v. Sowell et al
as 4:2016cv00692
Plaintiff:
Lester W. Shipman
Defendant:
Donald Sowell, Tommy Gage , Joseph Sclider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disability Law Claims, P.A. d/b/a lavan & neidenberg, P.A. et al
as 3:2015cv03800
Plaintiff:
Disability Law Claims PA and Case Ghost Inc
Respondent:
John Emerick and David Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disability Law Claims PA et al v. IM Solutions LLC
as 3:2015mc00130
Plaintiff:
Disability Law Claims PA and Case Ghost Inc
Respondent:
John Emerick and David Cooke
Defendant:
IM Solutions LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
