Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Susan Spell v. Judge David Cunningham III et al
as 2:2014cv09806
Defendant:
Judge David Cunningham, III, Does, Judge Scott Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Spell
USA v. David Cunningham
as 14-4538
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID CUNNINGHAM
Ayman Farraj v. David Cunningham, et al
as 14-55091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AYMAN FARRAJ, on behalf of himself and his two minor children, G1F and G2F, as their Guardian Ad Litem
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CUNNINGHAM, Judge of the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, BRUCE HARSHMAN, PH.D., CARL HOPPE, PH.D. and others
Ayman Farraj v. David Cunningham et al
as 2:2013cv06107
Defendant:
David Cunningham, Does, Bruce Harshman and others
Plaintiff:
Ayman Farraj
Martin Reiner v. State of California, et al
as 13-55437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN REINER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Department of Industrial Relations, RICHARD SHAPIRO, DIEDRE LOWE and others
Martin Reiner v. State of California Department of Industrial Relations et al
as 2:2012cv08649
Defendant:
Richard Aldrich, Tricia Biglow, California State Bar and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Reiner
Michael Crockett, II v. State of California, et al
as 12-56321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CROCKETT, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, GEORGE VALVERDE and others
Michael Crockett v. State of California et al
as 2:2012cv01741
Defendant:
California Dept of Motor Vehicles, David Cunningham, Fesia Davenport and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Crockett
John Palmer v. David Cunningham
as 11-20729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CUNNINGHAM, Attorney at Law
Baker et al v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 1:2011cv06768
Plaintiff:
Dina Baker , Ken Baker and David Cunningham
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
