Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc et al v. Center for Medical Progress et al
as 2:2019mc00007
Defendant: Center for Medical Progress, Biomax Procurement Services, LLC, Albin Rhomberg and others
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast and others
Respondent: Deborah Nucatola
Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest v. Daleiden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00002
Defendant: Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, David Daleiden and BioMax Procurement Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest
Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest v. Daleiden et al
as 2:2019at00032
Defendant: Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, David Daleiden and BioMax Procurement Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest
Jane Does 1-10, et al v. University of Washington, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-35003
Plaintiff - Appellant: JANE DOES 1-10, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and JOHN DOES 1-10, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and DAVID DALEIDEN, an individual
Center for Medical Progress, et al v. USDC-CASF
as 17-73313
: In re: CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS and DAVID DALEIDEN
Petitioner: CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS and DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, NAF, PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., DBA Planned Parenthood Northern California and others
National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress, et al
as 17-16862
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, NAF
Defendant - Appellant: CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS and DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis
Defendant: BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC and TROY NEWMAN
National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-16622
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, NAF
Respondent - Appellant: STEVE COOLEY and BRENTFORD J. FERREIRA
Defendant: CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis and others
Jane Does 1-10, et al v. David Daleiden, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-36038
Plaintiff - Appellee: JANE DOES 1-10, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and JOHN DOES 1-10, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID DALEIDEN, an individual
Defendant: ZACHARY FREEMAN, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON and PERRY TAPPER, Public Records Compliance Officer at the University of Washington, in his official capacity
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16997
Plaintiff - Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., DBA Planned Parenthood Northern California, PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis and others
Defendant: TROY NEWMAN and PHILLIP S. CRONIN
Defendant - Appellee: ALBIN RHOMBERG
Jane Does 1-10 et al v. University of Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01212
Plaintiff: Jane Does 1-10 and John Does 1-10
Defendant: University of Washington, David Daleiden, Zachary Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?