Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gillespie v. Basse et al
as 1:2016cv00204
Petitioner:
William B. Gillespie
Defendant:
David R. Basse, Marcia Odal, Michelle Hofmaier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillespie v. Basse et al
as 7:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
William B. Gillespie
Defendant:
David R. Basse, Marcia Odal, Michelle Hofmaier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nedro Parker, et al v. TDCJ, et al
as 14-10190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEDRO GWEN PARKER and FREDERICK DEONE GOODEN
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCIENCE CENTER/CORRECTIONAL MANAGED HEALTH CARE CONTRACT (COMMITTEE), RICHARD E. WATHEN, In his official capacity and under color of office and others
Parker et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ)
as 7:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nedro Gwen Parker and Frederick Deone Gooden
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James D Anders, Charles Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Brisco v. David Potter, et al
as 11-10177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LOUIS BRISCO, also known as Michael Briscoe
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID E. POTTER, M.D. and AMY NEWMAN, R.N.
Briscoe v. Potter et al
as 7:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael Briscoe
Defendant:
David E Potter and Amy Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briscoe v. Potter et al
as 7:2009xc00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Briscoe
Defendant:
David E Potter and Amy Newman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
v. Potter, et al.,
as 7:2009xc00168
Defendant:
David E Potter, et al., and Amy Newman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Martinez v. Potter et al
as 7:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
Alejandro G. Martinez
Defendant:
David E Potter and Denise DeShields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bourgeois v. Potter
as 7:2007cv00011
Plaintiff:
David Bourgeois
Defendant:
David E Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
