Cases 51 - 60 of 362
BROWN v. HAINES
as 1:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
AVRIL D. HAINES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
LVNV Funding LLC v. David Myers, et al
as 22-80106
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID EDWARD MYERS and MARY ANN MYERS, Debtors
Petitioner / Appellant:
LVNV FUNDING LLC
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID EDWARD MYERS and MARY ANN MYERS
Wood v. Lumpkin
as 7:2022cv00204
Petitioner:
David Edward Wood
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
David Irwin
as 22-80087
Respondent:
In re: DAVID EDWARD IRWIN, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 31, 2011
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14838
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAMIQUIZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14028
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD LAMIQUIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLAIBORN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11216
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD CLAIBORN and DAVID E CLAIBORN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BROCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09211
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD BROCK and DAVID EDWARD BROCK, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
