Cases 1 - 10 of 29
David Everett Leibowitz v. Riverside County et al
as 5:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
David Everett Leibowitz
Defendant:
Riverside County and City of Indio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PROFFITT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01496
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, SAVINO and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EVERETT PROFFITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proffitt v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
David Everett Proffitt
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Savino, Corizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everette v. Royce
as 22-1878
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Everette
Respondent / Appellee:
Mark Royce, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
David E. Leibowitz v. The People of the State of California
as 5:2022cv00982
Petitioner:
David Everett Leibowitz
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Everette v. Bell
as 1:2018cv03674
Petitioner:
David Everette
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Jones v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 18-11583
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID EVERETT JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv00932
Petitioner:
David Everett Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Hughes et al
as 1:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
Regan Morris
Defendant:
Albert Hughes, Nicholas Dicostanzo and David Everett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Miller v. David Everett, et al
as 16-16745
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK A. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EVERETT, JOHN KEAST, ISIDRO BACA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
