Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Balderas v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Balderas, Jr.
Defendant:
David Gonzales and Carlos Omar Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Ector County Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales
Defendant:
Ector County Sheriffs Office, TDCJ Board of Pardons and Paroles and TDCJ Parole Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Gonzales
as 22-10537
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John David Gonzales
Martinez v. City of Leon Valley et al
as 5:2020cv00270
Plaintiff:
Sandra C. Martinez
Defendant:
Officer FNU Vasquez, City of Leon Valley, Detective Alex King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Walker, et al v. Beaumont Indep School District, et al
as 17-40752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN GARY WALKER, WALKER'S ELECTRIC, WALKERS ELECTRIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BEAUMONT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, AARON COVINGTON, LEROY SALEME and others
Gonzales v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 6:2017cv00058
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and Connie Elizabeth Frisbee
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gonzales v. Collier
as 1:2017cv00060
Respondent:
Exec. Director Bryan Collier
Petitioner:
David Gonzales
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00279
Petitioner:
David Gonzales
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Patrick Jones v. James Sowell, et al
as 15-41345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK ALEXANDER JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES SOWELL, also known as UP Sowell, PAUL HAYES, also known as UP Hayes, G. MALDONADO, JR., Regional Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
