Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Robinson v. Harder
as 24-1156
Defendant:
DAVID STANTON, SOBIA MIRZA, DAVID HARDER and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ROBINSON
Campbell v. New York State Police et al
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
David John Campbell
Defendant:
New York State Police, Steven A. Negrelli, Broome County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitney v. Kraham et al
as 3:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Joey Whitney
Defendant:
Jarod Kraham, Nancy J. Williams, Kevin Griffiths and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peoples v. Harder et al
as 9:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Leroy Peoples
Defendant:
David Harder and Mark Smolinsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Lowell J. Britt and Lowell J. Britt, IV
Defendant:
John Doe, State of New York, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Village of Endicott et al
as 3:2021cv01186
Plaintiff:
Ryan L. Brown
Defendant:
Village of Endicott, Michael McEwan, County of Broome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrington v. County of Broome et al
as 3:2020cv01514
Defendant:
Addiction Center of Broome County, Inc., David Harder, County of Broome and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua J. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
HARDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv11835
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DAVID HARDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. County of Broome et al
as 9:2017cv01398
Plaintiff:
Wanda Barnes
Defendant:
County of Broome , David Harder , Mark Smolinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Burke et al
as 9:2017cv01345
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. Burton
Defendant:
Officer Burke, Officer Tiner, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
