Cases 21 - 30 of 39
David Stapleman v. Public Safety & Corrections, et al
as 13-30027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN STAPLEMAN, also known as David Stapleton
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, JIMMY LEBLANC, LIBBY TIGNER and others
Stapleton v. Correction Corp of America et al
as 1:2012cv01859
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Stapleton
Defendant:
Correction Corp of America, Tim Keith, Nicole Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stapleton v. Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00823
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Stapleman
Defendant:
Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Jimmy LeBlanc, Libby Tigner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Moss v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-10181
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN MOSS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
David Luttrell v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-10115
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN LUTTRELL
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Luttrell v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2011cv00471
Petitioner:
David Lynn Luttrell
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moss v. Thaler
as 3:2011cv00411
Petitioner:
David Lynn Moss
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Rutledge v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-41011
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN RUTLEDGE
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Curtis Wolf v. David Hudson
as 10-40360
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS RAY WOLF
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID LYNN HUDSON
Rutledge v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 9:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Rutledge
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
