Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MADDOX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13245
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DAVID MADDOX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hodierne v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pasco County)
as 8:2023cv00336
Petitioner:
David M. Hodierne
Respondent:
David Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HODIERNE v. MADDOX
as 5:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
DAVID M HODIERNE
Respondent:
DAVID MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEWITT v. MADDOX
as 4:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R DEWITT
Defendant:
DAVID MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2021cv00089
Defendant:
DAVID MADDOX, B FREDERICKS, MICHELLE LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
TARRUS HAKEEM KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTER v. MADDOX et al
as 5:2020cv00297
Defendant:
DAVID MADDOX, J HUTCHINS, J CHADLER and others
Plaintiff:
AARON C PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORMAN et al v. MADDOX et al
as 4:2020cv00437
Defendant:
DAVID MADDOX, TIMOTHY JETTON, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN L NORMAN and KEONA S BERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shea v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00349
Defendant:
David Maddox, Florida Department of Corrections and Brandon Pitts
Plaintiff:
Joanne M. Shea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEA v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00350
Defendant:
David Maddox, Florida Department of Corrections and Brandon Pitts
Plaintiff:
Joanne M. Shea and JOANNE M SHEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELEON v. JONES et al
as 5:2019cv00064
Defendant:
DAVID MADDOX, KENNETH RAPPAPORT, JULIE L JONES and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE DELEON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
