Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Roerig v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
as 7:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell Roerig
Defendant:
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hoff et al v. McCoy Corporation
as 1:2016cv00988
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hoff, David Mitchell, Melissa Pool and others
Defendant:
McCoy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Mitchell v. Smart et al
as 4:2014cv00457
Petitioner:
Brian David Mitchell
Respondent:
Elizabeth Smart and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mitchell v. State Farm LLoyds
as 1:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
State Farm LLoyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Paselk v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Carol Paselk
Defendant:
State of Texas, Hopkins County Texas, Hopkins County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 9:2009cv00160
Petitioner:
David Mitchell
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Director
as 6:2009cv00125
Petitioner:
David Mitchell
Respondent:
Director
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mitchell v. Director
as 9:2009cv00045
Petitioner:
David Mitchell
Respondent:
Director
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stewart v. Cleburne Police Department et al
as 3:2008cv00230
Plaintiff:
Nathan Paul Stewart
Defendant:
Cleburne Police Department, Cleburne Police Department, Terry Powell and others
Counter Claimant:
Scott Cain, Scott Cain and Scott Cain
Counter Defendant:
Nathan Paul Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mitchell et al v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
Francis Mitchell and David Mitchell
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
