Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Eggert v. Ovsak et al
as 0:2014cv01677
Plaintiff:
William Eggert
Defendant:
Keri A. Ovsak, Andy Kvien, Lisa Nygren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prentice Wheatley v. Michelle Smith, et al
as 14-2200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prentice Wheatley
Defendant - Appellee:
Michelle Smith, Stephen Craane, Keith Krueger and others
v. Wheatley et al
as 0:2014cv00880
Plaintiff:
Prentice Wheatley
Defendant:
Jackson Evans, David Paulson, Nannette Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
de la Garza v Roy et al
as 0:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Cesar de la Garza
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Corizon Inc., Nanette Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prentice Wheatley v. Michelle Smith, et al
as 13-3413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prentice Wheatley
Defendant - Appellee:
Michelle Smith, Stephen Craane, Keith Krueger and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2013cv02958
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
LaFountaine v. Reishus et al
as 0:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
Richard John LaFountaine
Defendant:
Dave Reishus, David Paulson, Stephen Craane and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv02990
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Corrections Medical Services and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv01554
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
