Cases 21 - 30 of 137
Ni v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv06190
Defendant:
Secretary Jeh Johnson, Director, USCIS TSC David Roark and Director USCIS Leon Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Jihong Ni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lopez v. Richardson et al
as 1:2016cv09670
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Defendant:
Gregory A. Richardson, David Roark, Malethea Holmes-Okeawolman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ZHENG v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv05251
Plaintiff:
DAMI ZHENG
Defendant:
JEH C. JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
SAP v. Roark et al
as 1:2016cv11525
Plaintiff:
Vatanak SAP
Defendant:
David Roark , Leon Rodriguez and Jeh Johnson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Weng et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv03721
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, David Roark and Leon Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Li Jia Lin and Zhen Weng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LI v. Neufeld et al
as 1:2016cv00702
Plaintiff:
Changzhu LI
Defendant:
Donald Neufeld, Leon Rodriguez, Michele T Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
LI v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv02731
Plaintiff:
RONG LI
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, MICHAEL BORGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gandhi et al v. Lynch et al
as 4:2016cv01037
Plaintiff:
Sue Gandhi and Ketanbahen Mody
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Tony Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pan et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv01876
Defendant:
James Comey, Jeh Johnson, David Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Yanzhen Pan and Liangguang Zheng
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Hicks et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as KYW/3:15-cv-00842
Plaintiff:
Allen Hicks , Bradley Furlong , Chris Kingery and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG , Syngenta Crop Protection AG , Syngenta Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
