Cases 1 - 10 of 32
USA v. Ricardo Salazar-Marcano
as 22-12182
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICARDO DAVID SALAZAR-MARCANO
SALAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02621
Plaintiff:
DAVID SALAZAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49940
Plaintiff:
DAVID SALAZAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crosetti Brand v. William Murawski, et al
as 21-1596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CROSETTI BRAND
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SALAZAR, THERESA TORRES and WILLIAM MURAWSKI
Lewis v. Salazar et al
as 2:2021cv02008
Defendant:
Dennis Gardner, Vermilion County Illinois, Stephane Weber and others
Plaintiff:
Keyvell Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Cruz v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2020cv10205
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, David Salazar, Robert Done and others
Plaintiff:
Robert De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09457
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oscar Olivas v. David Salazar, et al
as 20-56155
Respondent:
DAVID SALAZAR, Port Director of Calexico West Port of Entry, Customs and Border Patrol, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, Secretary of Homeland Security, JOHN F. KERRY, Secretary of State and others
Petitioner:
OSCAR OLIVAS
SALAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40658
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92878
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
