Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Sample v. SLI Enterprises Inc et al
as 3:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Donel Sample
Defendant:
SLI Enterprises Inc, David Scott Forbes and Zackary Shea Adams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
BASF Corporation v. Starx Investment Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01206
Defendant:
David Scott Starkes, Starx Investment Holdings Inc. doing business as Georgetown Collision Repair, Inc. and Scott Starkes
Plaintiff:
BASF Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Holcomb v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01239
Petitioner:
David Scott Holcomb
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. USA
as 1:2021cv00099
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth David Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00477
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Scott v. Lemdke et al
as 1:2018cv00610
Defendant:
Sgt FNU Orange, Officer FNU Lemdke and Sgt FNU Burkhart
Plaintiff:
David Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Taylor County et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ken David Scott
Defendant:
Taylor County, TX, Ricky Bishop, Taylor County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Culp v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00212
Petitioner:
David Scott Culp
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kirkpatrick v. Holder et al
as 1:2015cv00313
Defendant:
Richard L. Durbin, Eric J. Holder and The Department of Justice of the United States of America
Plaintiff:
David Scott Kirkpatrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirkpatrick v. United States Of America
as 6:2014cv00465
Plaintiff:
David Scott Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
