Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shaffer v. State of California et al
as 3:2013cv04625
Petitioner:
David Lloyd Shaffer
Respondent:
State of California, Kamela Harris and Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaffer v. State of California et al
as 3:2013cv03979
Petitioner:
David Lloyd Shaffer
Respondent:
State of California and Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaffer v. State of California et al
as 3:2013cv03373
Petitioner:
David Lloyd Shaffer
Respondent:
State of California, Valley State Prison Medical Department and Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaffer v. Illston et al
as 3:2013cv02231
Petitioner:
David Lloyd Shaffer
Respondent:
Susan Illston and Ray Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaffer v. Davis et al
as 3:2013cv02096
Petitioner:
David Lloyd Shaffer
Respondent:
Ray Davis and Susan Illston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaffer v. Sixth District Appellate Program et al
as 5:2013cv01472
Plaintiff:
David Lloyd Shaffer
Defendant:
Sixth District Appellate Program and San Jose California Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. Hartley
as 3:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
David Lloyd Shaffer
Respondent:
Hartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. Hartley
as 3:2012cv05675
Petitioner:
David Lloyd Shaffer
Respondent:
Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaffer et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02189
Plaintiff:
David H. Shaffer and Janelle K. Shaffer
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
