Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lapinski et al v. Leech et al
as 6:2017cv01280
Plaintiff:
James F. Lapinski and Patricia Lapinski
Defendant:
Andrew Leech, Pamela DeCorah, Sandra C. Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
ADAMS v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2013cv14142
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. ADAMS
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams v. Town of Tuxedo et al
as 7:2013cv04601
Plaintiff:
David W. Adams
Defendant:
Town of Tuxedo and David W. Decker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
International Floor Crafts v. Dziemit, et al
as 09-2349
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL FLOOR CRAFTS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID W. ADAMS, TYRONE WILLIAMS, KEVIN BRITTO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JANE DZIEMIT
Trustee:
LOWELL FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK, WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, f/k/a First Union Bank of Virginia and others
International Floor Crafts v. Dziemit, et al
as 09-1556
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL FLOOR CRAFTS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID W. ADAMS, TYRONE WILLIAMS, KEVIN BRITTO and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
JANE DZIEMIT
Trustee:
LOWELL FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK, WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, f/k/a First Union Bank of Virginia and others
International Floor Crafts, In v. Dziemit, et al
as 09-1555
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL FLOOR CRAFTS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID W. ADAMS, TYRONE WILLIAMS, KEVIN BRITTO and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
JANE DZIEMIT
Trustee:
LOWELL FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK, WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, f/k/a First Union Bank of Virginia and others
La Quinta Corporation, et al v. Heartland Properties LLC, et al
as 08-6368
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LA QUINTA CORPORATION and BAYMONT FRANCHISING LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
HEARTLAND PROPERTIES LLC, DAVID W. ADAMS and BETTY L. ADAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
