Cases 1 - 10 of 14
D. B. et al v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2021cv02154
Plaintiff:
D. B., K. B., Ilia Burrise and others
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Eric Jones, David Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Birmingham Relief and Retirement System v. Hastings et al
as 5:2018cv02107
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Relief and Retirement System
Defendant:
Reed Hastings , David Wells , Richard Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
M.C.F. et al v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2017cv02038
Plaintiff:
M.C.F. , K.S.F. and Estate of Colby Friday
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Eric Jones, David Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
F. et al v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2017at00812
Plaintiff:
L. F. and K. F.
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Stockton Police Department, Eric T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L.F., et al v. City of Stockton, et al
as 2:2017cv01648
Plaintiff:
L. F. and K. F.
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Stockton Police Department, Eric T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ziolkowski v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01070
Plaintiff:
James Ziolkowski
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings and David Wells
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States of America v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2016mc00257
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arturo Gonzalez , Esteban Rodriguez , Jorge Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
David Wells v. Bruce F Marrs et al
as 2:2013cv07813
Defendant:
Bruce F Marrs, Karen Olfin, Wade T Olsen and others
Plaintiff:
David Wells
Christopher David Wells v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 2:2013cv04084
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Wells
Schulthes v. Netflix Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00712
Plaintiff:
Martin Schulthes
Defendant:
Netflix Inc , Reed Hastings and David Wells
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
