Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. Thomas et al
as 6:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Herrington
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Thomas, Jail Admin #1 Russ Carmack, Jail Admin #2 Brett Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. County of Erie et al
as 1:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
David White
Defendant:
County of Erie, Sheriff John Garcia, Deputy Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hervey v. Lief et al
as 4:2023cv04092
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Hervey
Defendant:
R Lief, Tyler Crouse, Stephanie Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00321
Petitioner:
David White
Respondent:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
White v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
David White
Respondent:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
David White v. Estella Derr
as 22-15676
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
ESTELLA DERR, Warden
White v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
David White
Defendant:
Estella Derr and Dr. Kwon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
