Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Holland v. Elkhart County Corrections
as 3:2023cv00872
Plaintiff: David William Holland, Jr
Defendant: Elkhart County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nail v. Tarlton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00247
Plaintiff: David William Nail and David W Nail
Defendant: Scott Lee Tarlton and Brent Parson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 Violation of Emerg Med Treatment & Active Labor Act
WILLIAMS et al v. MENARD, INC. d/b/a MENARDS
as 2:2022cv00563
Plaintiff: CHERYL WILLIAMS and DAVID WILLIAMS
Defendant: MENARD, INC. d/b/a MENARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Blanton v. Colbert
as 1:2022cv00330
Plaintiff: David William Dean Blanton
Defendant: Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Tim
as 1:2022cv00309
Plaintiff: David William Dean Blanton
Defendant: Tim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Tim et al
as 1:2022cv00298
Plaintiff: David William Dean Blanton
Defendant: Tim and Elijah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01977
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TOUMI et al v. KREUTZBERGER et al
as 1:2021cv01948
Plaintiff: MOHAMED TOUMI, MADISON AUTO LLC D/B/A MADISON AUTO SALES and MADISON AUTO, LLC doing business as MADISON AUTO SALES
Defendant: DAVID WILLIAMS and JOSHUA SCOT KREUTZBERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottrell v. Marshall County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv01043
Defendant: Hancock, Crawford, Wagers and others
Plaintiff: David William Boone Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottrell v. Marshall County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00734
Defendant: Trudy, Crawford, Horton and others
Plaintiff: David William Boone Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?