Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Justice v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2022cv02193
Petitioner:
Lotus Justice and Lotus Justice, restricted
Respondent:
State of Ohio, David Young and Common Pleas Court Franklin County Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justice v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2021cv05903
Plaintiff:
Lotus Justice
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Attorney General, State of Ohio, Bureau of Criminal Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Young v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03632
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00169
Plaintiff:
James David Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 0:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 5:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Young et al
as 1:2016cv01135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bell
Defendant:
David Young, Kelly Norman Rose, Adrienne Husty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2015cv00842
Plaintiff:
Allen Hicks , Bradley Furlong , Chris Kingery and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv00872
Plaintiff:
David Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
