Cases 1 - 10 of 296
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03097
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Scott v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Scott
Defendant:
Gene Ward and Angie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jaramillo v. North Restaurants LLC
as 2:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Jaramillo, Donald Zahnd, Deisha Dabdoub and others
Defendant:
North Restaurants LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Heide (ID 108654) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Jay Steven Heide
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Kansas, State of, Anthony Leon Bartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03074
Petitioner:
Matthew Evan Davis, Sr.
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis (ID 6598) v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Wichita, Kansas, City of
as 2:2024cv02032
Plaintiff:
Marte A. Thomas and Tara Davis
Defendant:
Wichita, Kansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quinn v. Davis et al
as 5:2023cv03244
Plaintiff:
Ronald Quinn
Defendant:
Joshua Davis and Cory Horalek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
