Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Albert St. Clair, Jr. v. DeAngelo Anthony, et al
as 24-11302
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ST. CLAIR, JR.
Defendant:
DEANGELO M. ANTHONY, DEREK R. GULLEDGE, ERIC STROM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DeAngelo v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv20686
Plaintiff:
Elaine DeAngelo
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Thomas v. Cheetwood et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Thomas
Defendant:
Richard Cheetwood, William Calcutt, Matthew Medert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. IGO et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO WOODS
Defendant:
IGO and CRAFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Marques Howard
as 23-13841
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUES DEANGELO HOWARD
WHITLOW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21189
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO WHITLOW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13648
Plaintiff:
TAVARE DEANGELO HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARMWOOD JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12275
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO ARMWOOD JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02274
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO MONTEZE MOSLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
