Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Essential Ingredients, Inc. v. GLSD Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03123
Plaintiff:
Essential Ingredients, Inc.
Defendant:
GLSD Holdings, Inc., Sun & Skin Care Research, LLC and Gary D. Deangelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gales v. Bryson et al
as 5:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Gales
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Gregory C. Dozier, Tom Gramiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARB v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 528 et al
as 4:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
DUANE BARB
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 528 , CALVIN SIDERS and DEANGELOE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blanton v. Brown et al
as 1:2014cv01474
Plaintiff:
Marcus Deangelo Blanton
Defendant:
Thomas Brown, Jeffery Mann, Stanci Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Perkins
as 1:2013cv03599
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Wright
Respondent:
Steve Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright et al v. Grubbs et al
as 1:2011cv03129
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Jean Wright and United States
Respondent:
Addele Grubbs and Neil Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Batson v. Glynn County Detention Center et al
as 2:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
Carlvus DeAngelo Batson
Defendant:
Glynn County Detention Center, Dr. Garner, Nurse Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Clayton County Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jamel DeAngelo Thompson
Defendant:
Clayton County Judicial Circuit, Erman J. Tanjuatco, William H. Ison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Corrections Corp. of America et al
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jamel Deangelo Thompson
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America, Todd Thomas, Peggie Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
