Cases 11 - 20 of 273
Gonzalez v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv01347
Plaintiff:
Jesus Dejesus Gonzalez
Defendant:
J. Franklin and SUPERINTENDENT Ramson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. FRANKLIN et al
as 2:2023cv02986
Plaintiff:
JESUS DEJESUS GONZALEZ
Defendant:
J. FRANKLIN and SUPERINTENDENT RAMSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DEJESUS v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv03464
Plaintiff:
NATIVIDAD DEJSUS and NATIVIDAD DEJESUS
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., JOHN DOES 1 - XX and JOHN DOES I THROUGH XX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Dejesus v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
Alicia Rae Dejesus
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Woloshin, et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Staff Lt. Orlando DeJesus, Robert May, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DeJesus v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Alexis DeJesus
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DEJESUS v. ADMINISTRATOR et al
as 1:2023cv02391
Petitioner:
JESUS DEJESUS
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC v. DEJESUS
as 1:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
NICHOLAS ROBERTO DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
