Cases 31 - 40 of 318
US v. Bobby Haislip
as 22-4062
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BOBBY WAYNE HAISLIP, a/k/a Roberto Wayne Haislip, a/k/a Robert Wayne Haislip, a/k/a Roberto Fabian DeJesus
United States of America v. Swinton (Smith)
as 22-165
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kareem Swinton, AKA K., Harold Butler, AKA Haas, Edwin DeJesus and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Andre Smith, AKA Dre
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dejesus Cedeno v. Argent Trust Company
as 21-2891
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ramon Dejesus Cedeno
Defendant / Appellant:
Argent Trust Company, Ryan Sasson, Daniel Blumkin and others
United States v. Lopez
as 21-6152
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
OSCAR DE JESUS LOPEZ, AKA Oscar DeJesus A-Lopez, AKA Oscar De Lopez, AKA Oscar De J Pez, AKA Oscar De A-Pez
Rogelio DeJesus v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-13252
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROGELIO CASTILLO DEJESUS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Kevin Blake v. Andrew Bryant, et al
as 21-13070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN LAMAR BLAKE
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW E. BRYANT, Deputy Sheriff, individual capacity, JORDAN M. DZIENDZIEL, Detective, individual capacity, BRIAN P. SAVELLI, Detective, individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adrian GuilleIn re: Adrian Guille
as 21-2842
Petitioner:
In re: ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Respondent:
DAVID RICHARDS, AMY EMRICH, S. PATTERSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
