Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lepage v. Duhaime et al
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Robert Lepage
Defendant:
Diane Duhaime, Town of North Smithfield, Cynthia DeJesus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00502
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dejesus v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 1:2013cv00497
Plaintiff:
Elio R. Dejesus
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Dejesus et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 1:2013cv00469
Plaintiff:
Angel Dejesus and Barbara Dejesus
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and GMAC Mortgage Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Dejesus v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
John Dejesus
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dejesus et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 1:2012cv00539
Plaintiff:
Angel Dejesus and Barbara Dejesus
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and GMAC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeJesus v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 1:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jose A DeJesus
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , Credit Suisse Financial Corp. and Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeJesus Castillo v. USA
as 1:2008cv00327
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Modesto DeJesus Castillo
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DeJesus v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00446
Plaintiff:
Sheila DeJesus
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
