Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Watson v. Deacon Construction LLC
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Diana Watson
Defendant:
Deacon Construction LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Jeffrey Sherburne et al v. Walter Bowman et al
as 5:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sherburne, Thomas Brackin, Keith Manley and others
Defendant:
Walter Bowman, Bruce Dalfonso, James Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James Jackson v. R. Nelson, et al
as 21-35562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES D. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
R. NELSON, CO, R. A. YOUNG, Capt., WANONS, Cpl. and others
Jason Ellis v. Hammon, et al
as 21-35312
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCH, C.O. TRCI, HAMMON, C.O. OSP, HOUSTON, Lt. TRCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON MICHAEL ELLIS
(SS) Deacon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00641
Plaintiff:
Pamela Marie Deacon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Glover v. Deer Ridge Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2020cv00393
Defendant:
Assistant Director Michael Gower, Jason Jorgenson, Tim Causey and others
Plaintiff:
Darin A. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Jackson v. Scott Yeager, et al
as 20-35197
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI GOUCHER, Sergeant, STEVEN BOSTON, Captain, MELISSA NOFZIGER, Assistant Inspector General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES D. JACKSON
Ellis v. Hammon et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant:
M. Gower, John Doe #2, 3, 4, 5, R. Persson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camirand v. Jones et al
as 2:2019cv01829
Defendant:
Mr. Young, T. Blewett, Mr. Gekler and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Leander Camirand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv01136
Defendant:
Steven Boston, Lt Chambers, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
