Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Boyd v. Manufacture of the Drug Zantac et al
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Manufacture of the Drug Zantac, William Brazier, John Doe and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Advert Security Contractor in Pearl Mississippi
as 4:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Advert Security Contractor in Pearl Mississippi and Advert Security Contractor in Pearl Mississippi doing business as Advert Group USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. King
as 22-60104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee:
Ronald King, Mississippi Correctional Facility Superintendent, in his Individual and Official Capacity and Doctor William Brazier
Boyd v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Dewayne Collier and C.N.A. Reginald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Sutton et al
as 4:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Lieutenant Silvia Sutton, Allison Unknown, Veroncia Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Boyd v. Shivers
as 3:2021cv00689
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Joann Shivers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Denisha Jenkins and Nurse Money
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Boyd v. Gaddis
as 21-60732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee:
Menarvia Nixon Gaddis and William Brazier, Medical Doctor; Indvidual capacity and Official capacity
Boyd v. Gaddis
as 3:2021cv00604
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Menarvia Nixon Gaddis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Spencer
as 21-60718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee:
Barry Spencer, Physical Therapist and Medical Doctor J. Glisson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
