Cases 31 - 40 of 84
James Munson v. Faiyaz Ahmed, et al
as 22-1675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FAIYAZ AHMED, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WARDEN OF LAWRENCE CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Valdez-Lamont v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv00286
Petitioner:
Jordan Valdez-Lamont
Respondent:
Deanna Brookhart, David A. Hylla, Richard L Tognarelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Wexford Health Care Service et al
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Clifton Jackson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care Service, Rob Jeffreys and Deanna Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Cecil et al
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Kendrick H Ingram, Sr
Defendant:
Heather Cecil, Deanna Brookhart and Dan Downen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01585
Plaintiff:
Dante Small
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Source, Lawrence Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conyears v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv01383
Plaintiff:
Brian Conyears
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Deanna Brookhart and Wexford Healthcare Sources, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carnalla-Ruiz v. Brookhart
as 1:2021cv05527
Petitioner:
Carnalla-Ruiz Gerson and Gerson Carnalla-Ruiz
Respondent:
State of Illinois and Dr. Deanna Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodall v. Brookhart
as 3:2021cv03221
Petitioner:
Robert M Woodall
Respondent:
Warden Deanna Brookhart
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gerson Carnalla-Ruiz v. Deanna Brookhart
as 21-2569
Petitioner / Appellant:
GERSON CARNALLA-RUIZ, also known as GERSON R. CARNALLA
Respondent / Appellee:
DEANNA BROOKHART
Ronnie Jones v. Deanna Brookhart
as 21-2419
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONNIE JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
DEANNA BROOKHART
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
