Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Corizon Health, et al
as 17-3087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KWAME OTOYUMABOYA HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C. GORDON HARROD, Medical Doctor and Physician for Corizon Health Services, Inc., in his individual and official capacity and others
Paige (ID 108422) v. Martell et al
as 5:2017cv03056
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Paige
Defendant:
(fnu) Martell, (fnu) Sleed, A. Sirmans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxum Indemnity Company v. R.M.F.S. Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
Maxum Indemnity Company
Defendant:
R.M.F.S. Inc., Randall Myers and Deanna Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hill (ID 100085) v. Corizon Health Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv03062
Plaintiff:
Kwame Otoyumaboya Hill
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Inc. , Kansas Department of Corrections , C. Gordon Harrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto-Montes (ID 89404) v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv03052
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Soto-Montes
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. , Baseer A. Sayeed , T. Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez (ID 84911) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03259
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nunez
Defendant:
James Heimgartner , Tammy Martin-Mosley , R. Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart et al v. Village of Riverdale et al
as 1:2012cv05628
Plaintiff:
Michael Lockhart and Deanna Morris
Defendant:
Village of Riverdale and Unknown Officers of the Village of Riverdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Houten v. Morris et al
as 5:2008cv03023
Plaintiff:
James E. Van Houten
Defendant:
Deanna Morris and Wanda Bokor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
