Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION v. TOP GLORY TRADING GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv14262
Defendant:
1-10 DOE and TOP GLORY TRADING GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION v. UNIQUE STAR FOOTWEAR INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02376
Plaintiff:
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION
Defendant:
UNIQUE STAR FOOTWEAR INC., SHOE PULSE and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION v. LAMBSKIN FASHION LLC et al
as 3:2017cv04912
Plaintiff:
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION
Defendant:
LAMBSKIN FASHION LLC and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 9,792 BOOTS, MORE OR LESS, BEARING "UGG SUN" LOGO DESIGN MARK HELD BY DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv03559
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
9,792 BOOTS, MORE OR LESS, BEARING "UGG SUN" LOGO DESIGN MARK HELD BY DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION
Claimant:
Golden Fleece Fashion Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Percoco v. Deckers Outdoor Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01001
Plaintiff:
Michael Percoco
Defendant:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation, Angel Martinez and Thomas A. George
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
