Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Agness McCurry v. D. Thomas, Jr., et al
as 23-6053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
D. KELLY THOMAS, JR., Senior Judge, JOSEPH P. AHILLEN, Senior Assistant Attorney General, ROGER A. PAGE, Justice and others
McCurry v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry
Defendant:
D Kelly Thomas, Joseph Ahillen, Roger Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valentine v. Gay
as 3:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Valentine
Defendant:
Dee David Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ivan Burley v. Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task Force, et al
as 23-5172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAN ANTJUAN BURLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUMNER COUNTY 18TH JUDICIAL DRUG TASK FORCE, SUMNER COUNTY, TN, JASON ARNOLD, Officer and others
Burley v. Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task Force
as 3:2019cv00118
Plaintiff:
Ivan Antjuan Burley
Defendant:
Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task Force, Officer Jason Arnold, Sumner County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Reece v. L. Whitley, et al
as 16-6793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
L. RAY WHITLEY, CHRIS VINES, WILLIAM LAMBERTH and others
Reece v. Whitley et al
as 3:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
James R. Reece
Defendant:
L. Ray Whitley, Chris Vines, The City of Gallatin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Reece v. Sumner County Tennessee, et al
as 10-5368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RICHARDSON REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUMNER COUNTY TENNESSEE, JAMES HUNTER, in his capacity as Judge of General Sessions Court I, C.L. BUCK RODGERS, in his capacity as Judge of 18th Circuit Court and others
Reece v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2009cv01049
Petitioner:
James Richardson Reece
Respondent:
Sumner County, Tennessee, James Hunter, C.L. "Buck" Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
