Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harrell, Vincent v. Morgan, Deirdre et al
as 3:2016cv00407
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Harrell
Defendant:
Deirdre Morgan , Michael Baenen, Sarah Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boehler, Eric v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Eric Boehler
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Edward Wall, Deirdre Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barksdale v. Wall et al
as 2:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kajuan L Barksdale
Defendant:
Edward F Wall , Charles Facktor, David Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schuenke, Lloyd v. Wisconsin Department of Correction's et al
as 3:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lloyd T. Schuenke
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Correction's , Edward Wall , Deirdre Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rzeplinski, James v. Maassen, Tammy et al
as 3:2014cv00820
Plaintiff:
James Rzeplinski
Defendant:
Tammy Maassen , Lizzie Tegels , Jodi Daugherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson, Lorenzo v. Wall, Edward et al
as 3:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Johnson
Defendant:
Edward F. Wall , Deirdre Morgan , Cathy A. Jess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Tony D Walker
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Edward Wall, Deirdre Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ciarpaglini v. McCreedy et al
as 2:2012cv00831
Plaintiff:
Robert B Ciarpaglini
Defendant:
William McCreedy, Robert Humphreys, Ann Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Morgan
as 2:2011cv00936
Petitioner:
Peter C Jones
Respondent:
Deirdre Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schmitt v. Morgan
as 2:2011cv00065
Petitioner:
Gregory R Schmitt
Respondent:
Deirdre Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
