Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00408
Interested Party: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc. (sued indiv. and as sii to DeLaval Separator Company and Sharples Inc.), General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Scott L. Hultner et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2024cv00409
Plaintiff: Scott L Hultner, Geraldine E Hultner, Scott L. Hultner and others
Petitioner: Alfa Laval, Inc. (sued indiv. and as sii to DeLaval Separator Company and Sharples Inc.)
Interested Party: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., General Electric Company, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as succesor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.) and others
Defendant: Paramount Global, Redco Corporation, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff: Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Talarczyk et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00836
Plaintiff: FRANCIS TALARCZYK and WANDA ALGARIN TALARCZYK
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, ALFA LAVAL INC., THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court: Jonathan C. Hollinshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Edmonds v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00825
Plaintiff: ARNOLD EDMONDS
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: Jonathan Hollingshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
EDMONDS v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 8:2022cv00824
Plaintiff: ARNOLD EDMONDS
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ALFA LAVAL INC., THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Horton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff: JULIA, Individually and as Special Administrator o HORTON and Julia Horton
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC., as Successor-in-Interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY, AR WILFLEY AND SONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hale et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. et al
as 3:2022cv01112
Plaintiff: Dennis Hale and Lora Hale
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corp., Alfa Laval Inc., BW/IP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
CARTER et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv64223
Plaintiff: LUTHER EUGENE CARTER and SONJA C. CARTER
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER et al v. A.W. CHESTERSON COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv60068
Plaintiff: LUTHER EUGENE CARTER and SONJA C. CARTER
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERSON COMPANY , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cross_claimant: SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC.
Cross_defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?