Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Longitude Licensing Limited v. Dell Technologies, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02312
Plaintiff: LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED
Defendant: Dell Technologies, Inc. and Dell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06573
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Mito et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00658
Defendant: Dell Products Corporation, Masahige Mito, Dell Technologies Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randall Pittman, et al v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, et al
as 19-56078
Defendant / Appellee: DELL, INC., COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS UNLIMITED, INC., AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: LYNN BUSSEY
Plaintiff / Appellant: RANDALL PITTMAN
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff: Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant: BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner: John Doe 1 and Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other: Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified: All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Intervenor: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology and U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party: Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett and Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MDL No. 1917 In Re: Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007cv05944
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Janet Ackerman, James E. Allee and others
Defendant: Technicolor S.A, Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Beijing-Matsushita Color CRT Company, Ltd. and others
Respondent: Alan Frankel
Interested Party: Wettstein & Sons, Inc, Mitsubishi Digital Electronics Americas, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. and others
Intervenor: State of Illinois, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division and State of Oregon
Other: Douglas W. St. John, Donnie Clifton, Harry Garavanian and others
Not Yet Classified: State of Connecticut, YRC, INC., Douglas A. Kelley and others
Special Master: James Larson, Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, Honorable Charles A. Legge and others
Petitioner: Jonathan Rich
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01540
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2002md01486
Plaintiff: Oracle America, Inc., Petro Computer Systems, Inc., Ashley Pritchett and others
Intervenor: Maurice Shelly, Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court: norman d palmer, Norman D. Palmer, Bryan Marcus and others
Defendant: Korea Development Bank, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Petitioner: Unisys Corporation, JACO Electronics, Inc, All American Semiconductor Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified: Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System, Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Celestica Corporation
Special Master: Charles B. Renfrew
Claimant: Oak Point Partners, Inc.
Respondent: Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Marc Lazo v. Dell Gen. P. Corp. et al
as 8:2018cv00181
Defendant: Dell Gen. P. Corp., Dell Inc. and Does
Mediator (ADR Panel: Tom Hanrahan
Plaintiff: Marc Lazo
Alacritech, Inc. v. CenturyLink Communications, LLC et al
as 5:2017mc80126
Plaintiff: Alacritech, Inc.
Defendant: CenturyLink Communications, LLC, Dell, Inc., Tier 3, Inc. and others
Miscellaneou: Facebook Technologies
Intervenor: Cavium, Inc. and Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?