Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Graham-El v. Waters et al
as 1:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Jerome Graham-El
Defendant:
Tom Waters, Alexandra Walker, Denise Balazic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed Jr. v. Transitional Counseling Service et al
as 1:2020cv02082
Defendant:
Joe Morales, Dawn (I) Conrad, Gayla Sykes and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Ray Reed Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2020cv02033
Defendant:
Jessica Archukete, State of Colorado, Scott Dauffenbach and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Edward McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Polis et al
as 1:2020cv00857
Defendant:
Candace Werth, Jared (I) S. Polis, Daniel (I) W. Carr and others
Plaintiff:
David Robert Gray, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Waters, et al
as 19-1205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMIE GRAHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WATERS, Parole Board Member, ALEXANDRA WALKER, Parole Board Member and DENISE BALAZIC, Parole Board Member
Graham v. Waters et al
as 1:2019cv01018
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Graham
Defendant:
Tom Waters, Alexandra Walker and Denise Balazic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neilsen v. Connaghan, et al
as 1:2017cv00617
Plaintiff:
Stone, Thomas Neilsen, Dustin Upchurch and others
Defendant:
Amaya, Aaron Amaya, Allison Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPherson v. Colorado Board of Parole et al
as 1:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
James Raymond McPherson
Defendant:
Colorado Board of Parole, Joe M. Morales, Alfredo Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrico et al v. Colorado Board of Parole, et al
as 1:2016cv02841
Petitioner:
Marie Carrico and Gary Carrico
Respondent:
Colorado Board of Parole, et al and Denise Balazic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wildermuth v. Key et al
as 1:2016cv01966
Petitioner:
Dean Wildermuth
Respondent:
James Key, Joe Morales, Brandon Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
