Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Amirul El v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2023cv12587
Plaintiff:
Mikhael Amirul El
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Kinloch Jonathan, Timothy Kenny and others
Claimant:
Mikhael Amirul El Trust and Michael Anthony Bryant, TTEE
Carlisle v. Tenneco, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Defendant:
Tenneco, Inc., Roy V. Armes, Thomas C. Freyman and others
Kihenjo v. Tenneco Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04018
Plaintiff:
Tequila Kihenjo
Defendant:
Tenneco Inc., Roy V. Armes, Thomas C. Freyman and others
Powell, et al. v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 5:2022cv10816
Plaintiff:
Michael Elliot Powell sui juris, Settlor and Trust Protector of Family of Truh Allah [Irrevocable Express] Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent, Michael Elliot Powell sui juris, Settlor and Trust Protector of Family of Truth Allah [Irrevocable Express] Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent and Family of Trust Allah Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel, Detroit, City of and others
Kirsch v. Tenneco Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Robert Kirsch
Defendant:
Tenneco Inc., Roy V Arnes, Thomas C. Freyman and others
Greenfield v. Tenneco Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
Damon Greenfield
Defendant:
Tenneco Inc., Roy V. Armes, Thomas C. Freyman and others
WHITFIELD v. TENNECO INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
TENNECO INC., ROY V ARMES, THOMAS C FREYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Waterman v. Tenneco Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01516
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Tenneco Inc., Roy V. Armes, Thomas C. Freyman and others
Truhlicka v. Tenneco, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02199
Plaintiff:
Eugene Truhlicka
Defendant:
Tenneco, Inc., Roy V. Armes, Thomas C. Freyman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
