Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tony Daugherty v. Dennis Dingus
as 23-7016
Petitioner / Appellant:
TONY DAUGHERTY
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS DINGUS, Warden
Joshua Slater v. Shelby Searls
as 20-6556
Respondent:
DENNIS DINGUS, Warden, Stevens Correctional Center and MARVIN C. PLUMLEY, Warden
Respondent / Appellee:
SHELBY SEARLS, Superintendent, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA LEE SLATER
Heavener v. West Virginia Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv03604
Plaintiff:
Ferlin Heavener
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections , McDowell County Commission , Ralph Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Dingus
as 2:2014cv27083
Petitioner:
William Adkins
Respondent:
Dennis Dingus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. McDowell County Commission, et al.
as 1:2014cv17900
Plaintiff:
Courtney S. Wallace, Sr.
Defendant:
McDowell County Commission , McDowell County Correctional Center , West Virginia Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Dingus
as 1:2013cv29389
Petitioner:
Clayton E. Carroll
Respondent:
Dennis Dingus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neunz v. Stevens Correctional Center et al
as 1:2013cv14151
Plaintiff:
Robert Neunz
Defendant:
Stevens Correctional Center, Dennis Dingus, McDowell County Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neunz v. McDowell County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2013cv13248
Plaintiff:
Robert Neunz
Defendant:
McDowell County Correctional Center, Debbie Cochran and Dennis Dingus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brennan v. McGraw et al
as 2:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
William A. Brennan
Defendant:
Darrell McGraw and Dennis Dingus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Osborne v. Dingus
as 6:2012cv01212
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Osborne
Respondent:
Dennis Dingus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
