Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Burnett v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Anthony Burnett and Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Purnell E. Davis, District Attorney Dennis E. Sanders, Public Defender William M. Wheeler and others
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALSTON v. IVEY et al
as 5:2016cv00567
Plaintiff:
DENNIS E ALSTON
Defendant:
IVEY and HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALSTON v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2016cv00533
Plaintiff:
DENNIS E ALSTON
Defendant:
THOMAS, HANCOCK STATE PRISON, MERESSEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALSTON v. HILL et al
as 5:2016cv00358
Plaintiff:
DENNIS E ALSTON
Defendant:
HILL and THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Johns et al
as 5:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Gordon
Defendant:
Tracy Johns, George Zoley, Donna Mellendick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Browning-Fote et al v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C. et al
as 2:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Catherine Browning-Fote and Jack P. Fote, SR.
Defendant:
Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C., Dennis E. Henry, Capital One Bank (USA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
