Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Smith v. Brangwynne et al
as 3:2019cv00620
Defendant:
Deputy J. Hann, Deputy K. Brangwynne, Deputy A. Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Zepeda-Zalaberry v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv02738
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda-Zalaberry
Defendant:
Dennis Smith, United States of America, R Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oshay Johnson v. CDCR, et al
as 14-16712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSHAY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, BRIAN DUFFY and others
Johnson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2013cv01730
Plaintiff:
Oshay Johnson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Board of Parole Hearings, Brian Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ichihara v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv01200
Plaintiff:
Richard John Ichihara
Defendant:
Dennis Smith, Unknown Gifford, Unknown Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ybarra v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2013cv01126
Plaintiff:
Robert Ybarra
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Cherry Phillips, Yolanda Fortune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Zepeda-Zalaberry v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv00993
Defendant:
Dennis Smith, Unknown Jenkin and T Bon
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda-Zalaberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Queen, Jr. v. Dennis Smith
as 13-15898
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL ROBERT QUEEN, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
DENNIS SMITH, Warden
Brooks v. Cate et al
as 2:2012cv02708
Plaintiff:
Gordon Brooks
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Jack Garner, Dennis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Bates et al
as 2:2012cv02308
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Roberts
Defendant:
Unknown Bates, Unknown Clemens, Unknown Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
