Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Van Dyke v. United States Probation Office, Probation Staff et al
as 1:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dennis Van Dyke
Defendant:
United States Probation Office, Probation Staff, State of North Carolina Department of Corrections, Avery Mitchell CI and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DYKE v. MULLEN et al
as 1:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, CLERK OF COURT ASHEVILLE WESTERN DISTRICT USDC, CLERKS OF COURT RUTHERFORDTON NC DISTRICT AND SUPERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. PIEDMONT CI et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
PIEDMONT CI, TABOR CI, PENDER CI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. WILKINSON et al
as 1:2015cv00907
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
WILKINSON, AGEE, HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv00678
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
KENT BROWN, FRANK WITNEY, ROBERT DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. CLERK OF COURT RUTHERFORD COUNTY et al
as 1:2015cv00637
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
CLERK OF COURT RUTHERFORD COUNTY, PIEDMONT CI ADMINISTRATION, TABOR CITY CI ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Brown et al
as 1:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Dennis Van Dyke
Defendant:
Kent W. Brown
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
THOMAS DAVIS, ROBERT JAMES DAVIS, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. FEDERAL GOV DOC ETC et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
FEDERAL GOV DOC ETC, STATE OF NC DOC, G. BILYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. WEBSTER et al
as 1:2015cv00201
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
JOE WEBSTER, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, PATRICIA S. CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
