Cases 1 - 10 of 33
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Denton v. USA
as 5:2021cv00081
Petitioner:
James Curtis Denton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Denton v. USA
as 5:2020cv00280
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steven Ray Denton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hughes v. Madison County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2018cv00263
Defendant:
Madison County Detention Facility, Jeff Neil and Francy Denton
Plaintiff:
Isaac Daniel Hughes
Arnold v. Harwood et al
as 1:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
Brian David Arnold
Defendant:
Buddy Harwood, Francie Denton and Tom Banks
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Snyder's-Lance, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Beth A. Daniel
Defendant:
Snyder's-Lance, Inc., Brian J. Driscoll, James W. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kendall v. Snyder's-Lance, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Martin Kendall
Defendant:
Snyder's-Lance, Inc., James W. Johnston, Brian J. Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sciabacucchi v. Snyder's-Lance, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sciabacucchi
Defendant:
Snyder's-Lance, Inc., Jeffrey A. Atkins, Peter P. Brubaker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Shaev Profit Sharing Account v. Snyder's-Lance, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
David B. Shaev Profit Sharing Account
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Atkins, Snyder's-Lance, Inc., Peter P. Brubaker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
DENTON v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU SUPPORT SERVICES CORP.
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
ALANA TOMLIN DENTON
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU SUPPORT SERVICES CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
