Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Ewers v. Royce
as 2:2024cv01865
Petitioner:
Deon Ewers
Respondent:
Mark Royce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whited v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Deon Whited
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Watts v. Beiersdorf Inc.
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Deon Watts
Defendant:
Beiersdorf Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Woodie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06262
Plaintiff:
Deon Leonandre Woodie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Elting v. Lassiter et al
as 1:2022cv08573
Plaintiff:
Deon Elting
Defendant:
Tasheka Lassiter, Delta Barometre and John and Jane Does 1-10
Interested Party:
New York State Office of Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elting v. Lassiter et al
as 9:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
Deon Elting
Defendant:
Tasheka Lassiter, Delta Barometre and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Santos Valdez et al v. Deon Realty, LTD. et al
as 1:2020cv07837
Defendant:
Bhagdatt Deonarain, Bhagdatt's Spices & Saree Center LTD. doing business as Bhagdatt's Spices & Saree Center, Barbara Deonarain and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Santos Valdez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lawrence v. Sherman et al
as 1:2020cv00694
Defendant:
Mayor Gary McCarthy, Robert Carney, Eric Clifford and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Uvarenkov v. Melvin et al
as 1:2020cv01383
Plaintiff:
Vitalii, Uvarenkov Vitalii and Vitalii Uvarenkov
Defendant:
Melvin, Blair Logistics, LLC and Deon Jamail Melvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
