Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 24-10244
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mason v. Sanchez
as 24-40146
Plaintiff: Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant: R. Sanchez, K. Garza, Unknown Morchequo and others
Mason v. Smith
as 24-10109
Plaintiff: Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant: Kevin Smith, Warden
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 24-10087
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, res
Mason v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff: Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant: Kevin Smith, Christopher Uledau, Bryan Rietsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. James Allred We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2024cv00005
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant: Preston Smith, Bill Clements, FNU Clemens and others
Respondent: James Allred and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 23-11267
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Adam Gonzalez
Mason v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00208
Plaintiff: Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant: Kevin Smith, Bryan Rietsma, Christopher Wiedau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Unknown Defendants We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff: Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant: Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04529
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?