Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SIERRA SNOWMOBILE FOUNDATION, a nonprofit corporation et al v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Pacific Southwest Region et al
as 2:2021at00978
Plaintiff:
SIERRA SNOWMOBILE FOUNDATION, a nonprofit corporation, JEFF WITTMAN, MARY KRUPKA and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Pacific Southwest Region, JASON KUIKEN, in his capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Stanislaus National Forest and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Oyen et al v. Lawrence County Commission et al
as 5:2018cv05034
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Oyen and William J. Locken
Defendant:
Lawrence County Commission and United States Department of Agriculture/United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
as 1:2014cv00589
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al v. Quan et al
as 3:2014cv00381
Defendant:
Department of Agriculture, United States, Maitou Americas, Inc., Occupants of the Premises and others
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Peper v. Department of Agriculture, Uni, et al
as 08-1131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH E. PEPER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES, MIKE JOHANNS, Secretary, in his official capacity, FOREST SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Saunders v. Department of Agriculture, United States
as 1:2008cv03021
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Saunders
Defendant:
Department of Agriculture, United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
