Cases 41 - 50 of 633
Threat v. Watson
as 2:2023cv10283
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Threat
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Women Huron Valley Correctional Facility, Sargent Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Parker v. Michigan Department of Corrections State Prison et al
as 2:2022cv12891
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Parker
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections State Prison, Macomb Correctional Facility Correctional Officers, Brown and others
Menefee v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10024
Plaintiff:
Rico Menefee
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Kristin Mason, Dian and others
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv12847
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Chapman, Jenkins and others
Benn, Jr. v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv13151
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deray Benn, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Ayesha Syed, S. Bergman and others
Whaley-El v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv12725
Plaintiff:
Kevin Arnaz Whaley-El
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Mr. Dorris and J. Bugbee
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv12848
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Chapman, G. Stephenson and others
Williams v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv12923
Petitioner:
David J. Williams
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Appling v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv13040
Petitioner:
Donald Darnell Appling
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
