Cases 1 - 10 of 10,853
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Robledo v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Robledo
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 24-10365
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Butler v. Krauter
as 24-10364
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
Lizette N. Krauter, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Admin, Clayton D. Straughan, Disciplinary Captain, FNU Whitfield, Unit Grievance Investigator and others
Williams v. Gauna
as 24-40278
Plaintiff:
Jemadari Chinua Williams
Defendant:
Joel Gauna, Region IV Director, TDCJ, Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, FNU Hall and others
Brantley v. Lumpkin
as 24-10363
Petitioner:
Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
McDonald v. Lumpkin
as 24-40269
Petitioner:
Joseph Christopher McDonald
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-10362
Petitioner:
Joseph Leonard Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 24-20169
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rogers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40255
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
