Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dustin Curtis v. State of Missouri, et al
as 23-3287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dustin Patrick Curtis
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Missouri, Aetna, et al., City of St. Charles, MO and others
Dustin Curtis v. State of Missouri, et al
as 23-3288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dustin Patrick Curtis
Plaintiff:
Cash Kayden Crities, Kouri Flores, Wendi Crities, Cash Flores and Phyinix Crities, Dayton Flores, Shelby Flores and Cheryl Curtis and all Clines and Curtis family members
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Missouri, Jailer Hoormann, Aetna, the insurance company that insure SCCDOC AETNA and others
Dustin Curtis v. State of Missouri, et al
as 23-3279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dustin Patrick Curtis
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Missouri, Aetna, City of St. Charles, St. Charles, MO, USA and others
Curtis v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01173
Plaintiff:
Dustin Patrick Curtis
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Aetna, City of St. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Dustin Patrick Curtis
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Insurance Company Aetna, City of St. Charles, MO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Dustin Patrick Curtis, Cash Kayden Crities, Wendi Crities and others
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Jaler Hoormann, Aetna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Hennepin County Sheriff's Department et al, The et al
as 0:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Paul Campbell
Defendant:
Hennepin County Sheriff's Department et al, The, Richard Stanek, Brady Sweitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2010cv02086
Plaintiff:
Lavonda D. Scott, Candies Trice and Darion McMiller
Defendant:
State of Texas and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
