Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberts v. Smith County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Smith County Sheriff Department, Better Business Bureau, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
James Earl Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. U.S. Department of Education Default Resolution Group
as 1:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
Keith Thomas
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education Default Resolution Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. US Department of Justice et al
as 5:2020cv00143
Defendant:
US Department of Education, Federal Bureau of Investigation and US Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. US Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00150
Defendant:
US Department of Education, Federal Bureau of Investigation and US Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey v. United States Department of Education
as 4:2020cv00002
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lawrence Casey
Defendant:
United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv00400
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Department of Education
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Equifax et al
as 5:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Dayrin L Robinson
Defendant:
Equifax, Experian, Transunion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drakes v. T.C.C.F. et al
as 3:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Dario Drakes
Defendant:
T.C.C.F., C.O.C.F., P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 10-50527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, PRESIDENT OF THE USA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
